Paper: arXiv 2404.16449
Abstract
In this study, we utilize the Kalman-Filter analysis to assess market efficiency in major stock markets. The Kalman-Filter operates in two stages, assuming that the data contains a consistent trendline representing the true market value prior to being affected by noise. Unlike traditional methods, it can forecast stock price movements effectively. Our findings reveal significant portfolio returns in emerging markets such as Korea, Vietnam, and Malaysia, as well as positive returns in developed markets like the UK, Europe, Japan, and Hong Kong. This suggests that the Kalman-Filter-based price reversal indicator yields promising results across various market types.
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 6.5/10
- Empirical Rigor: 6.0/10
- Quadrant: Holy Grail — high math complexity, high empirical rigor
Why this score: The paper employs a complex recursive algorithm (Kalman Filter) to model market states, showing moderate math complexity, and presents backtests across multiple markets (US, UK, etc.) with specific date ranges and performance data, indicating substantial empirical rigor.
Research Flowchart
flowchart TD Start["Research Goal:<br>Assess market efficiency<br>using Kalman Filter"] --> Data["Data: Main Stock Markets<br>(Developed & Emerging)"] Data --> Method["Methodology:<br>Kalman Filter 2-Stage Analysis<br>True Value + Noise Model"] Method --> Compute["Computation:<br>Price Reversal Indicator<br>Forecasting Algorithm"] Compute --> Outcomes["Key Findings:<br>Significant Returns in Emerging Markets<br>(Korea, Vietnam, Malaysia)<br>Positive Returns in Developed Markets"]
Cited References (20)
- Variance Ratios. (2000)
- Systematic noise (2009)
- Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. (2000)
- Research in emerging markets finance: looking to the future. (2002)
- A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. (1996)
- Variance‐ratio tests of random walk: an overview. (2009)
- Statistical tests and retention of terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials. (1993)
- Does the stock market overreact? (1985)
and 12 more
- Who blinks in volatile markets, individuals or institutions?. (2002)
- Do market efficiency measures yield correct inferences? A comparison of developed and emerging markets (2010)
- Stock returns predictability and the adaptive market hypothesis in emerging markets: evidence from India (2014)
- Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns (1990)
- Comparing linear and nonlinear forecasts for stock returns (2001)
- China’s evolving stock market efficiency reconsidered: The Kalman filter analysis (2001)
- Recurrent neural network and a hybrid model for prediction of stock returns. (2015)
- International stock market efficiency and integration: evidences from Asian and US markets (2015)
- Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? (1981)
- Inefficient markets: An introduction to behavioural finance (2000)
- Tapping the brakes: Are less active markets safer and better for the economy? (2014)
- An empirical analysis of the Adaptive Market Hypothesis with calendar effects: Evidence from China (2019)
0 of 20 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.