Paper: arXiv 2512.22476

Authors: Kaihong Deng

Abstract

Backtests of cryptocurrency perpetual futures are fragile when they ignore microstructure frictions and reuse evaluation windows during parameter search. We study four liquid perpetuals (BTC/USDT, ETH/USDT, SOL/USDT, AVAX/USDT) and quantify how execution delay, funding, fees, and slippage can inflate reported performance. We introduce AutoQuant, an execution-centric, alpha-agnostic framework for auditable strategy configuration selection. AutoQuant encodes strict T+1 execution semantics and no-look-ahead funding alignment, runs Bayesian optimization under realistic costs, and applies a two-stage double-screening protocol across held-out rolling windows and a cost-sensitivity grid. We show that fee-only and zero-cost backtests can materially overestimate annualized returns relative to a fully costed configuration, and that double screening tends to reduce drawdowns under the same strict semantics even when returns are not higher. A CSCV/PBO diagnostic indicates substantial residual overfitting risk, motivating AutoQuant as validation and governance infrastructure rather than a claim of persistent alpha. Returns are reported for small-account simulations with linear trading costs and without market impact or capacity modeling.

Complexity vs Empirical Score

  • Math Complexity: 6.0/10
  • Empirical Rigor: 5.5/10
  • Quadrant: Holy Grail — high math complexity, high empirical rigor

Why this score: The paper employs advanced Bayesian optimization and statistical diagnostics (CSCV/PBO) for rigorous validation, but its empirical testing is constrained to a limited set of assets and small-account simulations without market impact modeling.

Research Flowchart

  flowchart TD
  A["Research Goal:<br>Quantify backtest fragility & design auditable tuning"] --> B{"Inputs: 4 Crypto Perpetuals"}
  B --> C["Methodology: AutoQuant Framework"]
  C --> D["Execution: Bayesian Optimization<br>with T+1 semantics & costs"]
  D --> E{"Double Screening:<br>Rolling Windows + Cost Sensitivity"}
  E --> F["Outcomes: Overfitting Diagnostics<br>and Validated Configs"]
  F --> G["Key Findings:<br>Costs reduce returns; DCS lowers drawdowns"]

Cited References (46)

  1. The Limits of Arbitrage (1997) — link
  2. The Deflated Sharpe Ratio: Correcting for Selection Bias, Backtest Overfitting, and Non-Normality (2014) — link
  3. Advances in Financial Machine Learning (2018) — link
  4. Seven Sins of Quantitative Investing (2019)
  5. Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms (2012) — link
  6. Algorithms for Hyper-Parameter Optimization (2011) — link
  7. Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization (2012) — link
  8. Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces (1997) — link
and 38 more
  1. The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Comparing Review (2006) — link
  2. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning (1989)
  3. backtrader: Python Backtesting Library for Trading Strategies (2025)
  4. The Jackknife and the Bootstrap for General Stationary Observations (1989) — link
  5. Zipline: A Pythonic Algorithmic Trading Library (2025)
  6. Freqtrade: Free, Open Source Crypto Trading Bot (2025)
  7. FinRL: Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Quantitative Finance (2025)
  8. Trading and Arbitrage in Cryptocurrency Markets (2020) — link
  9. From Mining to Markets: The Evolution of Bitcoin Transaction Fees (2019)
  10. Decentralized Finance: On Blockchain- and Smart Contract-Based Financial Markets (2021) — link
  11. Automated Machine Learning: Methods, Systems, Challenges (2019) — link
  12. Optuna: A Next-Generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework (2019) — link
  13. The Probability of Backtest Overfitting (2017) — link
  14. Algorithmic and High-Frequency Trading (2015)
  15. The Science of Algorithmic Trading and Portfolio Management (2014)
  16. Empirical Asset Pricing via Machine Learning (2020)
  17. Deep Learning in Asset Pricing (2021)
  18. Deep Learning with Long Short-Term Memory Networks for Financial Market Predictions (2018)
  19. Learning to Trade via Direct Reinforcement (2001)
  20. Optimal Execution of Portfolio Transactions (2001) — link
  21. No-dynamic-arbitrage and market impact (2010) — link
  22. Anomalous Price Impact and the Critical Nature of Liquidity in Financial Markets (2011) — link
  23. Data-Snooping, Technical Trading Rule Performance, and the Bootstrap (1999) — link
  24. A Reality Check for Data Snooping (2000) — link
  25. A Test for Superior Predictive Ability (2005) — link
  26. \ldots and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns (2015) — link
  27. The FinTech Opportunity (2016) — link
  28. Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions (2017) — link
  29. Risks and Returns of Cryptocurrency (2020) — link
  30. Common Risk Factors in Cryptocurrency (2022) — link
  31. Perpetual Futures Pricing — → 2310.11771
  32. Pricing Perpetual Futures (2023) — link
  33. Perpetual Futures and Basis Risk: Evidence from Cryptocurrency (2025) — link
  34. Perpetual Futures Contracts and Cryptocurrency Market Quality (2025) — link
  35. Perpetual future contracts in centralized and decentralized exchanges: Mechanism and traders’ behavior (2024) — link
  36. Trading Activity and Price Discovery in Bitcoin Futures Markets (2021) — link
  37. Impact of Bitcoin Futures on the Informational Efficiency of Bitcoin Spot Market (2020) — link
  38. A comparison of machine learning and econometric models for pricing perpetual Bitcoin futures and their application to algorithmic trading (2023) — link

1 of 46 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.