Paper: arXiv 2404.12598

Abstract

This paper studies continuous-time risk-sensitive reinforcement learning (RL) under the entropy-regularized, exploratory diffusion process formulation with the exponential-form objective. The risk-sensitive objective arises either as the agent’s risk attitude or as a distributionally robust approach against the model uncertainty. Owing to the martingale perspective in Jia and Zhou (2023) the risk-sensitive RL problem is shown to be equivalent to ensuring the martingale property of a process involving both the value function and the q-function, augmented by an additional penalty term: the quadratic variation of the value process, capturing the variability of the value-to-go along the trajectory. This characterization allows for the straightforward adaptation of existing RL algorithms developed for non-risk-sensitive scenarios to incorporate risk sensitivity by adding the realized variance of the value process. Additionally, I highlight that the conventional policy gradient representation is inadequate for risk-sensitive problems due to the nonlinear nature of quadratic variation; however, q-learning offers a solution and extends to infinite horizon settings. Finally, I prove the convergence of the proposed algorithm for Merton’s investment problem and quantify the impact of temperature parameter on the behavior of the learning procedure. I also conduct simulation experiments to demonstrate how risk-sensitive RL improves the finite-sample performance in the linear-quadratic control problem.

Complexity vs Empirical Score

  • Math Complexity: 8.5/10
  • Empirical Rigor: 3.0/10
  • Quadrant: Lab Rats — theoretically deep, empirically untested

Why this score: The paper is highly mathematical, featuring advanced stochastic calculus, martingale theory, and convergence proofs for complex continuous-time problems, while the empirical backing is limited to theoretical proofs and simulation experiments on synthetic data without backtesting or real-world datasets.

Research Flowchart

  flowchart TD
  R["Research Goal: Continuous-time risk-sensitive RL with entropy regularization"]
  M["Key Methodology: Martingale formulation with quadratic variation penalty"]
  D["Data/Inputs: Merton investment problem & linear-quadratic control simulations"]
  C["Computational Process: Adapted Q-learning algorithm for risk-sensitive objectives"]
  O["Outcomes: Proof of convergence, quantitative impact of temperature parameter, improved finite-sample performance"]
  R --> M
  M --> D
  D --> C
  C --> O

Cited References (64)

  1. Risk-Sensitive Soft Actor-Critic for Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning under Distribution Shifts (2024) — link
  2. Optimal Scheduling of Entropy Regularizer for Continuous-Time Linear-Quadratic Reinforcement Learning (2024) — link
  3. Risk-sensitive Markov Decision Process and Learning under General Utility Functions (2023) — link
  4. Continuous Time q-Learning for Mean-Field Control Problems — → 2306.16208
  5. Learning equilibrium mean‐variance strategy (2023) — link
  6. Actor-Critic learning for mean-field control in continuous time (2023) — link
  7. A Finite Sample Complexity Bound for Distributionally Robust Q-learning (2023) — link
  8. Regret Bounds for Markov Decision Processes with Recursive Optimized Certainty Equivalents (2023) — link
and 56 more
  1. q-Learning in Continuous Time (2022) — link
  2. The reinforcement learning Kelly strategy (2022) — link
  3. Policy Gradient and Actor-Critic Learning in Continuous Time and Space: Theory and Algorithms (2021) — link
  4. Exponential Bellman Equation and Improved Regret Bounds for Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning (2021) — link
  5. Exploratory HJB Equations and Their Convergence (2021) — link
  6. Policy Evaluation and Temporal-Difference Learning in Continuous Time and Space: A Martingale Approach (2021) — link
  7. Policy iterations for reinforcement learning problems in continuous time and space - Fundamental theory and methods (2020) — link
  8. Hamilton-Jacobi Deep Q-Learning for Deterministic Continuous-Time Systems with Lipschitz Continuous Controls (2020) — link
  9. Entropy Regularization for Mean Field Games with Learning (2020) — link
  10. Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning: Near-Optimal Risk-Sample Tradeoff in Regret (2020) — link
  11. A Dynamic Mean-Variance Analysis for Log Returns (2020) — link
  12. Continuous‐time mean–variance portfolio selection: A reinforcement learning framework (2019) — link
  13. Making Deep Q-learning methods robust to time discretization (2019) — link
  14. Is Q-learning Provably Efficient? (2018) — link
  15. Distributionally Robust Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Wasserstein Distances (2018) — link
  16. Equivalence Between Policy Gradients and Soft Q-Learning (2017) — link
  17. Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approach (2015) — link
  18. Model-Based Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Environments Using Real-Time Constrained Optimization (2015) — link
  19. Risk-Sensitive Investment Management (2014) — link
  20. Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey (2013) — link
  21. Robust Portfolio Control with Stochastic Factor Dynamics (2013) — link
  22. General Bounds and Finite-Time Improvement for the Kiefer-Wolfowitz Stochastic Approximation Algorithm (2011) — link
  23. Robustness and ambiguity in continuous time (2011) — link
  24. Remarks on Risk-Sensitive Control Problems (2005) — link
  25. Robust Portfolio Rules and Asset Pricing (2004) — link
  26. Robust control and recursive utility (2003) — link
  27. Q-Learning for Risk-Sensitive Control (2002) — link
  28. Robust Control and Model Uncertainty (2001) — link
  29. Risk‐Sensitive Control and an Optimal Investment Model (2000) — link
  30. Stochastic Controls: Hamiltonian Systems and HJB Equations (1999)
  31. Risk-Sensitive Dynamic Asset Management (1999) — link
  32. Robust Properties of Risk-Sensitive Control (1998) — link
  33. A Stochastic Approximation Algorithm with Varying Bounds (1995) — link
  34. Risk-Sensitive Control on an Infinite Time Horizon (1995) — link
  35. Reinforcement learning in continuous time: advantage updating (1994) — link
  36. On the existence of optimal relaxed controls of stochastic partial differential equations (1992) — link
  37. Stochastic differential utility (1992) — link
  38. Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: A Theoretical Framework (1989) — link
  39. Knight on Risk and Uncertainty (1987) — link
  40. On stochastic relaxed control for partially observed diffusions (1984) — link
  41. Asymptotic evaluation of certain Markov process expectations for large time (1975) — link
  42. Optimal stochastic linear systems with exponential performance criteria and their relation to deterministic differential games (1973) — link
  43. Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case (1969) — link
  44. A Stochastic Approximation Method (1951) — link
  45. Reinforcement Learning for Continuous-Time Optimal Execution: Actor-Critic Algorithm and Error Analysis (2023) — link
  46. Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Time and Space: A Stochastic Control Approach (2020)
  47. Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion , volume 293 (2013)
  48. The exact law of large numbers via Fubini extension and characterization of insurable risks (2006) — link
  49. Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Time and Space (2000) — link
  50. Bellman Equations of Risk-Sensitive Control (1996) — link
  51. Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior (1989) — link
  52. A Convergence Theorem for Non Negative Almost Supermartingales and Some Applications (1985) — link
  53. Stochastic Approximation (1969) — link
  54. If ǫ ă 0 , t Z s ` ǫ 2 x Z yp s q , s ě 0 u is an pt F s u s ě 0 , P q -local submartingale (supermartingale), then t e ǫZ s , s ě 0 is also a F s s 0 , P supermartingale (submartingale)
  55. ii) the SDE (6) admits a unique weak solution (in the sense of distribution) for any initial p t, x q P 0
  56. Learning Merton’s strategies in an incomplete market: Recursive entropy regularization and biased Gaussian exploration

1 of 64 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.