Paper: arXiv 2512.12783

Authors: Atalay Denknalbant, Emre Sezdi, Zeki Furkan Kutlu, Polat Goktas

Abstract

Financial exclusion constrains entrepreneurship, increases income volatility, and widens wealth gaps. Underbanked consumers in Istanbul often have no bureau file because their earnings and payments flow through informal channels. To study how such borrowers can be evaluated we create a synthetic dataset of one hundred thousand Istanbul residents that reproduces first quarter 2025 TÜİK census marginals and telecom usage patterns. Retrieval augmented generation feeds these public statistics into the OpenAI o3 model, which synthesises realistic yet private records. Each profile contains seven socio demographic variables and nine alternative attributes that describe phone specifications, online shopping rhythm, subscription spend, car ownership, monthly rent, and a credit card flag. To test the impact of the alternative financial data CatBoost, LightGBM, and XGBoost are each trained in two versions. Demo models use only the socio demographic variables; Full models include both socio demographic and alternative attributes. Across five fold stratified validation the alternative block raises area under the curve by about one point three percentage and lifts balanced (F_{“1”}) from roughly 0.84 to 0.95, a fourteen percent gain. We contribute an open Istanbul 2025 Q1 synthetic dataset, a fully reproducible modeling pipeline, and empirical evidence that a concise set of behavioural attributes can approach bureau level discrimination power while serving borrowers who lack formal credit records. These findings give lenders and regulators a transparent blueprint for extending fair and safe credit access to the underbanked.

Complexity vs Empirical Score

  • Math Complexity: 2.0/10
  • Empirical Rigor: 7.0/10
  • Quadrant: Street Traders — practical and empirical, lighter on theory

Why this score: The paper uses standard machine learning models (CatBoost, LightGBM, XGBoost) with relatively simple implementation and presents clear empirical results (AUC, F1 scores) from a reproducible pipeline on a synthetic dataset, but does not involve advanced mathematical derivations or complex statistical theory.

Research Flowchart

  flowchart TD
  A["Research Goal:\nEstimate credit risk for underbanked\nusing alternative data"] --> B["Data Synthesis:\nCreate Istanbul 2025 Q1 synthetic dataset\nvia RAG + OpenAI o3"]
  B --> C["Features & Splits:\nSocio-demographic + Alternative attributes\n5-fold stratified validation"]
  C --> D["Modeling:\nTrain CatBoost, LightGBM, XGBoost\n(Demo vs Full models)"]
  D --> E["Outcomes:\nAUC +1.3%, F1 0.84→0.95\nOpen dataset & pipeline released"]

Cited References (29)

  1. The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19 (2022) — link
  2. Financial Inclusion and Inclusive Growth: A Review of Recent Evidence (2017) — link
  3. Invisible Primes: Fintech Lending with Alternative Data (2022) — link
  4. Behavior Revealed in Mobile Phone Usage Predicts Credit Repayment (2020) — link
  5. The Value of Big Data for Credit Scoring: Enhancing Financial Inclusion using Mobile Phone Data and Social Network Analytics (2019) — link
  6. Spatiotemporal Integration of Mobile, Satellite, and Public Geospatial Data for Enhanced Credit Scoring (2021) — link
  7. On the Rise of FinTechs: Credit Scoring Using Digital Footprints (2020) — link
  8. Super-app behavioral patterns in credit risk models: Financial, statistical and regulatory implications (2021) — link
and 21 more
  1. Deciphering Big Data in Consumer Credit Evaluation (2021) — link
  2. Does Psychometric Testing in Microfinance Actually Work?—The Case of Sogesol (2020) — link
  3. Psychometrics as a Tool to Improve Screening and Access to Credit (2015) — link
  4. Innovative Credit Risk Assessment: Leveraging Social Media Data for Inclusive Credit Scoring in Indonesia’s Fintech Sector (2025) — link
  5. Credit Scoring Using Machine Learning by Combing Social Network Information: Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending (2019) — link
  6. Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending (2013) — link
  7. Credit Scoring with Social Network Data (2016) — link
  8. The Roles of Alternative Data and Machine Learning in Fintech Lending: Evidence from the LendingClub Consumer Platform (2019) — link
  9. Financial inclusion and fintech: a state-of-the-art systematic literature review (2025) — link
  10. The Critical Role of Alternative Datasets in Credit Assessment Using Machine Learning Techniques (2024) — link
  11. Predictive Analytics for Financial Inclusion: Using Machine Learning to Improve Credit Access for Under Banked Populations (2024) — link
  12. Enhancing Credit Scoring Accuracy with a Comprehensive Evaluation of Alternative Data (2024) — link
  13. Credit Score Classification Using Advanced Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Approach (2025) — link
  14. CatBoost: Gradient Boosting with Categorical Features Support (2017) — link
  15. LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (2017) — link
  16. A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection (1995)
  17. Unlocking Credit Access: Using Non-CDR Mobile Data to Enhance Credit Scoring for Financial Inclusion (2025) — link
  18. A Boosted Decision Tree Approach Using Bayesian Hyper-Parameter Optimization for Credit Scoring (2017) — link
  19. Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach (1988) — link
  20. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System (2016) — link
  21. Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanations (2020) — link

0 of 29 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.