Paper: arXiv 2502.15800
Abstract
This paper explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) behave in a classic experimental finance paradigm widely known for eliciting bubbles and crashes in human participants. We adapt an established trading design, where traders buy and sell a risky asset with a known fundamental value, and introduce several LLM-based agents, both in single-model markets (all traders are instances of the same LLM) and in mixed-model “battle royale” settings (multiple LLMs competing in the same market). Our findings reveal that LLMs generally exhibit a “textbook-rational” approach, pricing the asset near its fundamental value, and show only a muted tendency toward bubble formation. Further analyses indicate that LLM-based agents display less trading strategy variance in contrast to humans. Taken together, these results highlight the risk of relying on LLM-only data to replicate human-driven market phenomena, as key behavioral features, such as large emergent bubbles, were not robustly reproduced. While LLMs clearly possess the capacity for strategic decision-making, their relative consistency and rationality suggest that they do not accurately mimic human market dynamics.
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 3.5/10
- Empirical Rigor: 7.0/10
- Quadrant: Street Traders — practical and empirical, lighter on theory
Why this score: The paper relies on a well-defined experimental design with clear statistical metrics (MSE, correlation) and visualizations of market behavior, indicating moderate empirical rigor, but its mathematical content is relatively light, focusing on behavioral comparisons rather than dense theoretical derivations.
Research Flowchart
flowchart TD RQ["Research Goal<br>Do LLM agents replicate<br>human market trading<br>and bubble formation?"] --> I["Inputs<br>Experimental Finance Design<br>(Classic Bubble/Crash Paradigm)"] I --> M["Methodology<br>Agent-Based Modeling<br>LLM Agents as Traders"] M --> MP["Market Scenarios<br>1. Single-Model Markets<br>2. Mixed-Model Battle Royale"] MP --> CP["Computational Process<br>Simulated Trading Sessions<br>Asset priced near<br>fundamental value<br>vs. Human trading data"] CP --> F["Key Findings<br>1. LLMs: 'Textbook-Rational'<br>2. Muted Bubble Formation<br>3. Low Strategy Variance<br>4. Do NOT replicate<br>human market dynamics"] F --> O["Outcome<br>LLM-only data is insufficient<br>for replicating<br>key human behavioral features"]
Cited References (83)
- Price bubbles with discounting: A web-based classroom experiment (2009) — link
- Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err (2015) — link
- A Turing test of whether AI chatbots are behaviorally similar to humans (2024) — link
- Artificial intelligence and its implications for income distribution and market structure (2020) — link
- Multi-agent reinforcement learning in sequential social dilemmas (2017)
- Large language models in finance: Analyzing sentiment and predicting market trends (2023) — link
- Machine behavior (2019) — link
- Bubbles, crashes, and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets (1988) — link
and 75 more
- What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles (2012) — link
- Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models (2022) — link
- Can large language models trade? Assessing AI behavior in financial markets (2022) — link
- Can Large Language Models beat wall street? Evaluating GPT-4’s impact on financial decision-making with MarketSenseAI (2024) — link
- FinRobot: AI Agent for Equity Research and Valuation with Large Language Models (2024) — link
- Algorithmic Collusion by Large Language Models (2024) — link
- Strategic Collusion of LLM Agents: Market Division in Multi-Commodity Competitions (2024) — link
- GPT-4 Technical Report (2023) — link
- Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances (2022) — link
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models (2023) — link
- Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback (2023) — link
- Language Models are Few-Shot Learners (2020) — link
- Playing Games with GPT: What Can We Learn About a Large Language Model from Canonical Strategic Games? (2024) — link
- Playing Repeated Games with Large Language Models (2023) — link
- Overconfidence and Bubbles in Experimental Asset Markets (2016) — link
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding (2021) — link
- Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems (2021) — link
- Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena (2023) — link
- Price Bubbles, Gender, and Expectations in Experimental Asset Markets (2017) — link
- Can LLMs Mimic Human-Like Mental Accounting and Behavioral Biases? (2024) — link
- Large Language Models as Simulated Economic Agents: What Can We Learn from Homo Silicus? (2023) — link
- Do Large Language Models Reason Like Us? (2024) — link
- Algorithm of Call Auction Price (2010) — link
- Dynamically optimized sequential experimentation (DOSE) for estimating economic preference parameters (2024)
- oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments (2016) — link
- Price bubbles in asset market experiments with a flat fundamental value (2005)
- Irrational exuberance and neural crash warning signals during endogenous experimental market bubbles (2014) — link
- Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens (2024) — link
- Mistral Large (24.11) (2024)
- Grok-2 Beta Release (2024)
- GPT-4o System Card (2024)
- Introducing Claude 3.5 Sonnet (2024)
- OpenAI API (2025) — link
- Latent dirichlet allocation (2003)
- Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora (2010)
- Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit (2009)
- Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques (2002)
- Decision-making behavior evaluation framework for LLMs under uncertain context (2024)
- Comparative analysis of LLM-based market prediction and human expertise with sentiment analysis and machine learning integration (2024)
- K-Level Reasoning: Establishing Higher Order Beliefs in Large Language Models for Strategic Reasoning (2024) — link
- LLM Knows Geometry Better Than Algebra: Numerical Understanding of LLM-based Agents in a Trading Arena — → 2502.17967
- TradingAgents: Multi-agents LLM Financial Trading Framework — → 2412.20138
- A Reflective LLM\textendash Based Agent to Guide Zero\textendash Shot Cryptocurrency Trading — → 2407.09546
- FinMem: A Performance-Enhanced LLM Trading Agent with Layered Memory and Character Design (2024)
- Pretrained LLM Adapted with LoRA as a Decision Transformer for Offline RL in Quantitative Trading — → 2411.17900
- LLM-Based Routing in Mixture of Experts: A Novel Framework for Trading — → 2501.09636
- TradExpert: Revolutionizing Trading with Mixture of Expert LLMs — → 2411.00782
- Stock Price Prediction with LLM-Guided Market Movement Signals and Transformer Model (2025)
- LLM-Augmented Linear Transformer–CNN for Enhanced Stock Price Prediction (2025)
- HedgeAgents: A Balanced-Aware Multi-Agent Financial Trading System (2025)
- FinCon: A Synthesized LLM Multi-Agent System with Conceptual Verbal Reinforcement for Enhanced Financial Decision Making (2024)
- A Multimodal Foundation Agent for Financial Trading: Tool-Augmented, Diversified, and Generalist (2024)
- Temporal Data Meets LLM–Explainable Financial Time Series Forecasting — → 2306.11025
- Large Language Model Driven Technical Analysis: Enhancing Predictive Accuracy and Interpretability in Stock Trading (2025)
- Can LLM-based Financial Investing Strategies Outperform the Market in Long Run? — → 2505.07078
- FinRL-DeepSeek: LLM-Infused Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning for Trading Agents — → 2502.07393
- When AI Meets Finance (StockAgent): Large Language Model-Based Stock Trading in Simulated Real-World Environments — → 2407.18957
- Can Large Language Models Effectively Process and Execute Financial Trading Instructions? (2024) — link
- When AI Meets Finance (StockAgent): Large Language Model-Based Stock Trading in Simulated Real-World Environments — → 2407.18957
- Enhancing Automated Trading with Sentiment Analysis: Leveraging Large Language Models for Stock Market Predictions (2025)
- What Teaches Robots to Walk, Teaches Them to Trade too–Regime Adaptive Execution using Informed Data and LLMs — → 2406.15508
- Stock Price Trend Prediction Using Emotion Analysis of Financial Headlines with Distilled LLM Model (2024)
- Financial LLM for Stock Price Analysis and Investment Recommendation (2025)
- A Multi-Agent System Based on LLM for Trading Financial Assets (2024)
- Predictive Power of LLMs in Financial Markets — → 2411.16569
- Bubbles, Crashes , and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets (1988) — link
- Empirical Asset Pricing with Large Language Model Agents (2024) — link
- Revolutionizing Finance with LLMs: An Overview of Applications and Insights (2024) — link
- Large Language Models and Financial Market Sentiment (2023) — link
- Sentiment Trading with Large Language Models — → 2412.19245
- Instruct-FinGPT: Financial Sentiment Analysis by Instruction Tuning of Large Language Models — → 2306.12659
- Mental accounting and consumer choice (1985)
- Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (2013)
- Can Generative AI agents behave like humans? Evidence from laboratory market experiments — link
- Can AI Replace Human Subjects? A Large-Scale Replication of Psychological Experiments with LLMs — link
15 of 83 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.