Paper: arXiv 2511.02518
Authors: Paulin Aubert, Etienne Chevalier, Vathana Ly Vath
Abstract
This paper develops a model for option market making in which the hedging activity of the market maker generates price impact on the underlying asset. The option order flow is modeled by Cox processes, with intensities depending on the state of the underlying and on the market maker’s quoted prices. The resulting dynamics combine stochastic option demand with both permanent and transient impact on the underlying, leading to a coupled evolution of inventory and price. We first study market manipulation and arbitrage phenomena that may arise from the feedback between option trading and underlying impact. We then establish the well-posedness of the mixed control problem, which involves continuous quoting decisions and impulsive hedging actions. Finally, we implement a numerical method based on policy optimization to approximate optimal strategies and illustrate the interplay between option market liquidity, inventory risk, and underlying impact.
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 8.5/10
- Empirical Rigor: 6.0/10
- Quadrant: Holy Grail — high math complexity, high empirical rigor
Why this score: The paper employs advanced stochastic control, Cox processes, and rigorous analysis of market impact and arbitrage, indicating high mathematical complexity. It also presents a numerical method based on policy optimization and discusses simulation-based experiments, demonstrating substantial empirical implementation efforts.
Research Flowchart
flowchart TD
Start["Research Goal<br/>Model Option Market Making with<br/>Hedging-Induced Market Impact"] --> Input
subgraph Input ["Data & Inputs"]
I1["Stochastic Option Demand<br/>Cox Process Intensities"]
I2["Underlying Asset State<br/>Inventory & Price Dynamics"]
end
Input --> Method
subgraph Method ["Methodology Steps"]
M1["Formulate Mixed Control Problem<br/>Continuous Quoting + Impulsive Hedging"]
M2["Identify Arbitrage &<br/>Market Manipulation Phenomena"]
M3["Implement Numerical Optimization<br/>Policy Iteration Algorithm"]
end
Method --> Outcome
subgraph Outcome ["Key Findings & Outcomes"]
F1["Established Well-Posedness<br/>of Control Problem"]
F2["Optimal Strategies Reveal<br/>Trade-offs: Liquidity vs. Inventory Risk"]
end
Start ~~~ Input
Input ~~~ Method
Method ~~~ Outcome
Cited References (16)
- Optimal execution and price manipulations in time-varying limit order books (2014) — link
- Dynamic optimal execution in a mixed-market-impact Hawkes price model (2016) — link
- Optimal execution of portfolio transactions (2001) — link
- High-frequency trading in a limit order book (2008) — link
- Algorithmic market making for options (2021) — link
- Deep hedging (2019) — link
- Optimal execution with limit and market orders (2015) — link
- Buy Low, Sell High: A High Frequency Trading Perspective (2014) — link
and 8 more
- A Stochastic Control Approach to Option Market Making (2015) — link
- Dynamical Models of Market Impact and Algorithms for Order Execution (2013)
- Dealing with the Inventory Risk. A solution to the market making problem (2013) — link
- Optimal High Frequency Trading with Limit and Market Orders (2013) — link
- Price manipulation and quasi-arbitrage (2004) — link
- Optimal Execution in a General One-Sided Limit-Order Book (2011) — link
- Market Making via Reinforcement Learning (2018) — link
- Option market making under inventory risk (2009) — link
0 of 16 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.