Paper: arXiv 2511.08621

Authors: Gaëtan Caillaut, Raheel Qader, Jingshu Liu, Mariam Nakhlé, Arezki Sadoune, Massinissa Ahmim, Jean-Gabriel Barthelemy

Abstract

The financial industry’s growing demand for advanced natural language processing (NLP) capabilities has highlighted the limitations of generalist large language models (LLMs) in handling domain-specific financial tasks. To address this gap, we introduce the LLM Pro Finance Suite, a collection of five instruction-tuned LLMs (ranging from 8B to 70B parameters) specifically designed for financial applications. Our approach focuses on enhancing generalist instruction-tuned models, leveraging their existing strengths in instruction following, reasoning, and toxicity control, while fine-tuning them on a curated, high-quality financial corpus comprising over 50% finance-related data in English, French, and German. We evaluate the LLM Pro Finance Suite on a comprehensive financial benchmark suite, demonstrating consistent improvement over state-of-the-art baselines in finance-oriented tasks and financial translation. Notably, our models maintain the strong general-domain capabilities of their base models, ensuring reliable performance across non-specialized tasks. This dual proficiency, enhanced financial expertise without compromise on general abilities, makes the LLM Pro Finance Suite an ideal drop-in replacement for existing LLMs in financial workflows, offering improved domain-specific performance while preserving overall versatility. We publicly release two 8B-parameters models to foster future research and development in financial NLP applications: https://huggingface.co/collections/DragonLLM/llm-open-finance.

Complexity vs Empirical Score

  • Math Complexity: 1.5/10
  • Empirical Rigor: 8.0/10
  • Quadrant: Street Traders — practical and empirical, lighter on theory

Why this score: The paper’s primary contribution is empirical, involving data curation, model fine-tuning on a large, structured dataset, and evaluation on a comprehensive financial benchmark suite, with links to released models. The mathematics is largely conceptual, focusing on LLM architectures and training methodologies rather than dense analytical derivations.

Research Flowchart

  flowchart TD
  A["Research Goal<br>Develop specialized LLMs for finance tasks<br>without losing general capabilities"] --> B["Methodology<br>Instruction-tune 5 LLMs (8B-70B) on curated corpus"]
  B --> C["Data & Inputs<br>High-quality financial corpus<br>English, French, German"]
  C --> D["Computational Process<br>Fine-tuning & Instruction Tuning"]
  D --> E["Evaluation<br>Benchmark suite vs. SOTA baselines"]
  E --> F["Key Outcomes<br>1. Consistent improvement in financial tasks<br>2. Retained general-domain performance<br>3. Released 8B models for research"]

Cited References (40)

  1. Qwen3 technical report (2025) — link
  2. The llama 3 herd of models (2024) — link
  3. Bloomberggpt: A large language model for finance (2023) — link
  4. Pixiu: A large language model, instruction data and evaluation benchmark for finance (2023) — link
  5. FinGPT: Open-Source Financial Large Language Models (2023)
  6. Finbert: A pretrained language model for financial communications (2020) — link
  7. Finbert: Financial sentiment analysis with pre-trained language models (2019) — link
  8. Finbert: A pre-trained financial language representation model for financial text mining (2021)
and 32 more
  1. FinBERT: A large language model for extracting information from financial text (2023)
  2. Finben: A holistic financial benchmark for large language models (2024)
  3. Demystifying domain-adaptive post-training for financial llms (2025) — link
  4. FineWeb-Edu: the Finest Collection of Educational Content (2024) — link
  5. The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scale (2024) — link
  6. FineWeb2: One Pipeline to Scale Them All – Adapting Pre-Training Data Processing to Every Language (2025) — link
  7. Effect of scale on catastrophic forgetting in neural networks (2021)
  8. Investigating the catastrophic forgetting in multimodal large language models (2023) — link
  9. An empirical study of catastrophic forgetting in large language models during continual fine-tuning (2025)
  10. Catastrophic forgetting in deep learning: A comprehensive taxonomy (2023) — link
  11. DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharing (2021) — link
  12. DEBERTA: DECODING-ENHANCED BERT WITH DISENTANGLED ATTENTION (2021) — link
  13. Rubric is all you need: Enhancing llm-based code evaluation with question-specific rubrics (2025) — link
  14. News from OPUS - A Collection of Multilingual Parallel Corpora with Tools and Interfaces (2009)
  15. Qwen3Guard Technical Report (2025)
  16. Detoxify (2020)
  17. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding (2019)
  18. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models (2023) — link
  19. Fineval: A chinese financial domain knowledge evaluation benchmark for large language models (2023) — link
  20. FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data (2021)
  21. ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answering (2022)
  22. FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answering (2023) — link
  23. HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence? (2019)
  24. Mmlu-pro: A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark (2024)
  25. Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems (2021) — link
  26. Ragas: Supercharge Your LLM Application Evaluations (2024)
  27. Zero: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models (2020)
  28. TRL: Transformer Reinforcement Learning (2020)
  29. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation (2002)
  30. Scaling Laws of Decoder-Only Models on the Multilingual Machine Translation Task (2024) — link
  31. Large language model adaptation for financial sentiment analysis (2024) — link
  32. The Language Model Evaluation Harness (2024) — link

0 of 40 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.