Paper: arXiv 2506.08026
Authors: Xibai Wang
Abstract
This paper proposes TIP-Search, a time-predictable inference scheduling framework for real-time market prediction under uncertain workloads. Motivated by the strict latency demands in high-frequency financial systems, TIP-Search dynamically selects a deep learning model from a heterogeneous pool, aiming to maximize predictive accuracy while satisfying per-task deadline constraints. Our approach profiles latency and generalization performance offline, then performs online task-aware selection without relying on explicit input domain labels. We evaluate TIP-Search on three real-world limit order book datasets (FI-2010, Binance BTC/USDT, LOBSTER AAPL) and demonstrate that it outperforms static baselines with up to 8.5% improvement in accuracy and 100% deadline satisfaction. Our results highlight the effectiveness of TIP-Search in robust low-latency financial inference under uncertainty.
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 6.0/10
- Empirical Rigor: 7.5/10
- Quadrant: Holy Grail — high math complexity, high empirical rigor
Why this score: The paper introduces a formal optimization formulation and a Pareto frontier concept for model selection under constraints, demonstrating moderate mathematical complexity. It provides strong empirical rigor by testing on multiple real-world LOB datasets, implementing dynamic scheduling, and reporting quantitative improvements (e.g., 8.5% accuracy gain, 100% deadline satisfaction) with ablation studies.
Research Flowchart
flowchart TD
A["Research Goal: Develop a time-predictable<br>inference scheduler for real-time<br>market prediction under uncertain load"] --> B["Data Preparation: Use Limit Order Book datasets<br>(FI-2010, Binance BTC/USDT, LOBSTER AAPL)"]
B --> C["Offline Profiling: Characterize model latency<br>and generalization performance"]
C --> D["Online Scheduling: Dynamic model selection<br>via TIP-Search to maximize accuracy<br>while meeting strict deadlines"]
D --> E{"Evaluation & Outcomes"}
E --> F["+8.5% Accuracy<br>vs. static baselines"]
E --> G["100% Deadline Satisfaction<br>under uncertain load"]
E --> H["Robust Low-Latency<br>Financial Inference"]
Cited References (15)
- DeepLOB: Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Limit Order Books (2019) — link
- Benchmark Dataset for Mid-Price Forecasting of Limit Order Book Data with Machine Learning Methods (2018) — link
- Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment (1973) — link
- LOBSTER: Limit Order Book Reconstruction System (2011) — link
- LiT: Limit Order Book Transformer (2025) — link
- ViT-LOB: Efficient Vision Transformer for StockPrice Trend Prediction Using Limit Order Books (2024) — link
- TLOB: A Novel Transformer Model with Dual Attention for Stock Price Trend Prediction with Limit Order Book Data (2025) — link
- Deep Limit Order Book Forecasting — → 2403.09267
and 7 more
- Empowering Adaptive Early-Exit Inference with Latency Awareness (2021) — link
- BranchyNet: Fast Inference via Early Exiting from Deep Neural Networks (2016) — link
- Clipper: A Low-Latency Online Prediction Serving System (2016) — link
- Serving DNNs Like Clockwork: Performance Predictability from the Bottom Up (2020) — link
- Model Selection for Latency-Critical Inference Serving (2024) — link
- SneakPeek: Data-Aware Model Selection and Scheduling for Inference Serving on the Edge (2025) — link
- INFaaS: A Model-Less and Managed Inference Serving System (2019) — link
1 of 15 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.